穿越活动断裂带深埋隧道围岩地震响应分析

孙红林, 肖遥, 刘府生, 申玉生, 张翔玮, 邓棣文

结构工程师 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5) : 66-78.

PDF(3471 KB)
PDF(3471 KB)
结构工程师 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5) : 66-78.
抗震与抗风

穿越活动断裂带深埋隧道围岩地震响应分析

  • 孙红林1, 肖遥2, 刘府生1, 申玉生2, 张翔玮1, 邓棣文2,*
作者信息 +

Seismic Response Analysis of Surrounding Rock of Deep Buried Tunnel Crossing Active Fault Zone

  • SUN Honglin1, XIAO Yao2, LIU Fusheng1, SHEN Yusheng2, ZHANG Xiangwei1, DENG Diwen2,*
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

西南艰险山区道路和铁路隧道工程占比大,存在着埋深大、地质条件复杂、地震活动频发的特点,还存在隧道工程与活动断裂小角度穿越的工程问题,且近场地震对不同埋深的围岩影响不同,因而活动断裂近场地震对隧道工程顺利施工和安全运营存在显著不利影响。基于此,本文首先基于国内外发生的多次灾难性地震对隧道工程的影响,分析归纳了历史地震震级对穿越发震断裂隧道围岩(围岩埋深、岩性和级别)破坏的影响规律。其次,结合活动断层等特性,获取了能够反映区域断层特征和脉冲特性的地震动记录。最后,采用有限差分软件FLAC3D研究了活动断裂近场地震对深埋隧道工程围岩的影响规律。研究结果表明:隧道埋深的增加使得隧道围岩更加稳定,对于隧道围岩的塑性变形有抑制作用。不同地震动作用下的最大剪应力和最大主应力走势基本相同,断层段隧道围岩应力均大于普通围岩段。IV级及以下围岩在200 m埋深、PGA在0.3g以上时发生了较大的位移和应力响应。响应水平随着PGA的增大而增加,PGA从0.2g到0.39g的过程中有一个较大的增加,增幅接近50%,此过程是隧道产生塑性变形的主要过程,塑性区面积也随着PGA的增大而逐渐增大,因而在穿越活动断裂深埋隧道需认真考虑其近场地震的影响。研究成果可为隧道抗震优化设计提供技术支撑。

Abstract

Tunnel engineering accounts for a large part of the road and railway projects in the dangerous mountains in southwest China. This area has large tunnel burial depth, complex geological conditions and frequent seismic activities. There are several engineering problems with small angle crossings between tunnel engineering and active faults. In addition, near-field earthquakes have different influences on surrounding rocks with different burial depths. Therefore, near-field earthquakes of active faults have significant adverse influences on the smooth construction and safe operation of tunnel engineering. Therefore, based on the impact of multiple disastrous earthquakes at home and abroad on tunnel engineering, the influence rules of historical earthquake magnitude on the damage of surrounding rock (surrounding rock burial depth, lithology and grade) of tunnels passing through the seismogenic fault are analyzed and summarized. Combined with the characteristics of active faults, the ground motion records that can reflect the regional fault characteristics and pulse characteristics are obtained. Finally, the finite difference software FLAC3D is used to study the influence of the active fault near-field earthquake on the surrounding rock of deep tunnel engineering. The results show that the tunnel surrounding rock is more stable with the increase of tunnel buried depth, which can restrain the plastic deformation of tunnel surrounding rock. The trend of maximum shear stress and maximum principal stress under different ground motions is basically the same, and the stress of tunnel surrounding rock in fault section is greater than that in ordinary section. The surrounding rock of Grade IV and below has a great displacement and stress response when the depth of tunnel is 200m and PGA is larger than 0.3g. The response level increases with the increase of PGA, and there is a large increase of nearly 50% in the process of PGA from 0.2g to 0.39g. This process is the main process of tunnel plastic deformation, and the area of plastic zone gradually increases with the increase of PGA. Therefore, the influence of near-field earthquakes should be carefully considered in deep-buried tunnels through active faults. The research results can provide technical support for seismic optimization design of tunnel.

关键词

活动断裂带 / 近场地震 / 隧道围岩 / 动力响应 / 数值模拟

Key words

active fault zone / near-field earthquake / tunnel surrounding rock / dynamic response / numerical simulation

引用本文

导出引用
孙红林, 肖遥, 刘府生, 申玉生, 张翔玮, 邓棣文. 穿越活动断裂带深埋隧道围岩地震响应分析. 结构工程师. 2024, 40(5): 66-78
SUN Honglin, XIAO Yao, LIU Fusheng, SHEN Yusheng, ZHANG Xiangwei, DENG Diwen. Seismic Response Analysis of Surrounding Rock of Deep Buried Tunnel Crossing Active Fault Zone. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS. 2024, 40(5): 66-78

参考文献

[1] 阎锡东,高军,韩翡,等.隧道穿越活动断裂带风险评价研究及工程应用[J].现代隧道技术,2020,57(5):10-22,60.
YAN Xidong,GAO Jun,HAN Fei,et al.Risk assessment and engineering application of tunnel crossing active fault zones[J].Modern Tunnel Technology,2020,57(5):10-22,60.(in Chinese)
[2] 崔景川,刘开之,彭文波,等.天山胜利隧道穿越活动断裂抗断设防范围研究[J].施工技术(中英文),2022,51(09):88-92.
CUI Jingchuan,LIU Kaizhi,PENG Wenbo,et al.Study on the range of active fault resistance defense for Tianshan Shengli Tunnel crossing[J].Construction Technology (Chinese and English),2022,51(9):88-92.(in Chinese)
[3] 徐锡伟,郭婷婷,刘少卓,等.活动断层避让相关问题的讨论[J].地震地质,2016,38(3):477-502.
XU Xiwei,GUO Tingting,LIU Shaozhuo,et al.Discussion on issues related to active fault avoidance[J].Seismogeology,2016,38(3):477-502.(in Chinese)
[4] 牟再来. 活动断层的避让问题探析[J].科技与创新,2020(21):64-65,67.
MOU Zailai.Exploration of avoidance problem of active fault[J].Science and innovation,2020(21):64-65,67.(in Chinese)
[5] 张航,杨文波,寇昊,等.高地应力与地震联合作用下软弱围岩隧道动力响应研究[J].铁道建筑,2021,61(6):49-53.
ZHANG Hang,YANG Wenbo,KOU Hao,et al.Study on the dynamic response of weak surrounding rock tunnels under the combined action of high ground stress and earthquake[J].Railway Architecture,2021,61(6):49-53.(in Chinese)
[6] 张治国,姜蕴娟,刘明.考虑黏聚力及地震力的浅埋偏压隧道围岩压力[J].中国矿业大学学报,2018,47(4):780-790.
ZHANG Zhiguo,JIANG Yunjuan,LIU Ming.Surrounding rock pressure of shallow buried unsymmetrical tunnel considering cohesion and seismic force[J].Journal of China University of Mining and Technology,2018,47(4):780-790.(in Chinese)
[7] 张稳军,焦亚磊,张高乐.复杂地层条件下大断面盾构隧道纵向地震响应分析[J].施工技术,2019,48(9):48-51.
ZHANG Wenjun,JIAO Yalei,ZHANG Gaole.Longitudinal seismic response analysis of large cross-section shield tunnels under complex geological conditions[J].Construction Technology,2019,48(9):48-51.(in Chinese)
[8] 黄生文,司铁汉,陈文胜,等.断层对大跨度隧道围岩应力影响的有限元分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006(S2):3788-3793.
HUANG Shengwen,SI Tiehan,CHEN Wensheng,et al.Finite element analysis of the influence of faults on the surrounding rock stress of large-span tunnels[J].Journal of Rock mechanics and Engineering,2006 (S2):3788-3793.(in Chinese)
[9] 朱星宇,谭富圣,王海彦,等.近断层地震动作用下地铁隧道动力响应分析[J].铁道建筑,2021,61(6):54-58.
ZHU Xingyu,TAN Fusheng,WANG Haiyan,et al.Dynamic response analysis of subway tunnels under near fault seismic motion[J].Railway Architecture,2021,61(6):54-58.(in Chinese)
[10] 方林,蒋树屏,林志,等.穿越断层隧道振动台模型试验研究[J].岩土力学,2011,32(9):2709-2713,2820.
FANG Lin,JIANG Shuping,LIN Zhi,et al.Study on shaking table model test of tunnel crossing fault[J].Geotechnical Soil mechanics,2011,32(9):2709-2713,2820.(in Chinese)
[11] 刘学增,王煦霖,林亮伦.60°倾角正断层黏滑错动对山岭隧道影响的试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2014,47(2):121-128.
LIU Xuezeng,WANG Xulin,LIN Lianglun.Experimental study on the influence of normal fault stick-slip dislocation with a dip angle of 60° on mountain tunnels[J].Journal of Civil Engineering,2014,47(2):121-128.(in Chinese)
[12] SHARMA S,JUDD W R.Underground opening damage from earthquakes[J].Engineering Geology,1991,30(3):263-276.
[13] 高峰,孙常新,谭绪凯,等.不同埋深隧道的地震响应振动台试验研究[J].岩土力学,2015,36(9):2517-2522,2531.
GAO Feng,SUN Changxin,TAN Xukai,et al.Shaking table test study on seismic response of tunnels with different burial depths[J].Rock Soil mechanics,2015,36(9):2517-2522,2531.(in Chinese)
[14] 蒋树屏,方林,林志.不同埋置深度的山岭隧道地震响应分析[J].岩土力学,2014,35(1):211-216,225.
JIANG Shuping,FANG Lin,LIN Zhi.Seismic response analysis of mountain tunnels with different burial depths[J].Geotechnical Soil Mechanics,2014,35(1):211-216,225.(in Chinese)
[15] 范建军,张浩.日本中越地震中山岭隧道变形破坏特征及影响因素分析[J].公路与汽运,2012(5):214-217.
FAN Jianjun,ZHANG Hao.Analysis of deformation and failure characteristics and influencing factors of mountain tunnels during the Sino Vietnamese earthquake in Japan[J].Highway and Motor Transport,2012(5):214-217.(in Chinese)
[16] 《工程地质手册》编委会.工程地质手册[M].5版.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2018.
Editorial Committee of Geological Engineering Handbook.Geological Engineering Handbook[M].5th ed.Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press,2018.(in Chinese)
[17] 林宗元. 简明岩土工程勘察设计手册[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2003.
LIN Zongyuan.Concise geotechnical engineering survey and design manual[M].Beijing:China Construction Industry Press,2003.(in Chinese)

基金

国家自然科学基金面上项目(52278372,52878370)
PDF(3471 KB)

1472

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/